Introduction of bond notes and demystifying the economic impact

-
The central bank in any country must be responsible for maintaining the value i.e. purchasing power of currencies, in Zimbabwe’s case this include the US dollar, bond note, rand etc. all the available currencies being used in the multiple currency regime. The value maintenance is important for a critical issue which require the trust of the citizens in the money in this case bond notes and all the currencies in the multiple currency basket.  Whilst the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) does not have the capacity to maintain values of currencies in the multiple currency basket the mandate to maintain the value of the bond note rest entirely on them. In this case the RBZ intends to maintain the exchange rate between US dollars and bond notes at 1:1. This is much like a fixed exchange rate regime, but different in the case that in this scenario there is no basis but a pure proposition and decree that the currencies are equivalent. It doesn’t follow that the value of 1 bond note will be equal to US$1, the proposition by RBZ does not have an intervention to influence market forces to ensure that the price of the currencies remain fixed. The exchange rate of Us dollars to bond notes can only be fixed by balancing demand and supply of the two currencies. In this case, it is not even possible to arrive at a balance of US dollars’ demand and supply versus the demand and supply of the bond note. The bond note proposition misses the required economic principles and is based on an unrealistic fixing of the exchange rate which is not practical in the real world. Maintaining a fixed exchange rate imply that when bond notes supply rises from the equilibrium point RBZ must go into the market and buy the bond notes, thereby injecting more US dollars into the market, if the supply of bond notes declines beyond the equilibrium they should increase it to the equilibrium by releasing bond notes and getting the excess US dollars.


There is no economic principle or fundamental used to arrive at the figure of US200m versus the total number of US dollar notes in the market and whether this will give the desired equilibrium where demand and supply of bond notes and US dollars is at balance. People of Zimbabwe don't trust that the bond notes will hold its value (i.e. in this case whether 1000 worth of bond notes will have the same value a month or year from now), because of this reason they will flee into other assets or currencies to maintain their purchasing power. The presence of multiple currencies will make it convenient for people to flee and reject bond in preference to other currencies. The disaster here is though we are using a multiple currency system those other currencies are equally not readily available in Zimbabwe, same as the US dollars. The consequence is a currency crises where demand for other currencies will rise and worsening the cash shortages. What will happen to those who hold an account in rand, pula or euros with Zimbabwean banks, when they want to withdraw their money the bank will offer to convert all these currencies to bond notes so that they can issue what is available, the bond note. Zimbabwe may not hold a referendum for bond notes but everyone will get to vote on how much they trust the new currency (bond notes) by their marginal propensity to hold it, or trade it away for something else. For retailers, it's a question of whether they will accept the currency in trade for goods, or something else or some other currency in Zimbabwe’s case. The bulk of traders are importing from South Africa and other countries the goods they are selling, therefore selling in bonds will involve taking more risk because their target aim is to get foreign currency to replenish their supplies.

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Zimbabwe’s budget deficits, government debt and economic effects

-
The policy that ‘we eat what we kill’ was made popular in Zimbabwe during the Global Political Agreement period when Tendai Biti was the Minister of Finance. This is a principle advocated for by balanced-budget proponents. On the contrary governments also run budget deficits I have dedicated this article to explain the concept of budget deficits. A budget deficit the amount by which public spending exceeds revenue over a particular period of time. The Zimbabwean government is currently running budget deficits. The harmful effects of running budget deficits include; crowding out of the private sector, high real rates of interest, low national savings, low economic growth rates, large current account deficits and inflation, among others. John Maynard Keynes holds that in times of severe economic shriveling in the private economy, it is tolerable for the government to go into debt and increase spending to compensate for the fall in consumer and other private sector expendit
Read more

Public financial transparency and accountability of government revenues and expenditures in Zimbabwe

-
Zimbabweans are familiar with budget statement presented by the Minister of Finance in the parliament every year but unfortunately the public has never received detailed financial statements after expenditure. Zimbabweans usually know the amount which is allocated to certain ministries such as health, education social welfare but the public has never received financial reports detailing how the money was used. The lack of financial reporting means that the public has no information to make the government accountable. Accountability has been viewed since time immemorial as a channel for ascertaining the use of power by an individual or an organization that has been entrusted with the task of performing prescribed tasks (Premchand 1999).  Kautilya wrote a manual on bureaucracy before the Christian age, he observed that human nature was disposed to acquire public money for private gain. He wrote: “Just as it is impossible not to taste honey or poison that one may find at the tip of o
Read more

Should Zimbabwe adopt the Rand as official currency?

-
Image
Follow @ExpBusinessSA Dollarization is a situation where a country uses another currency officially or unofficially as legal tender. There are greater economic benefits to be realised by going for full official dollarization compared to semi-official or unofficial dollarization. Dollarization does not always involve the US dollar as the adopted currency, the euro can be adopted by non-EU members in the same way Zimbabwe can adopt the South African Rand through full official Randrisation. Official dollarization requires to surrender monetary policy to another country and often a country loses seigniorage and an independent monetary policy. If Zimbabwe chooses dollarization by adopting full official randrisation, the country will still export and earn US dollars and use the same US dollars for imports and international obligations. The only difference is that the rand will be the predominant or exclusive legal tender for local transactions. The official randrisation discussed here
Read more