Will Zimbabwe's dedollarization efforts through bond notes succeed?

-
The recent introduction of a new currency by Zimbabwe’s central bank the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) result in a process called reverse dollarization. Baliño, Bennett, and Borensztein (1999) note that reversing dollarization may be difficult because changes in practices regarding the settlement of transactions may be a slow process that depends on institutional changes and takes place only when there are significant benefits to be gained by switching currencies. The process will not be easy as people’s preferred choice of holding and storing value remains United States dollars and not the surrogate currency. There are no significant benefits to be gained by switching from foreign currency to bond notes. Forced dedollarization has had limited success, while dollarization may have fallen in the short run and was sustained in some cases, countries that tried to force dedollarization experienced financial disintermediation and capital flight (Menkulasi, Erasmus, & Leichter, 2009). In Zimbabwe the bond note introduction is a forced dedollarisation mainly because people are forced to accept it as there are no alternatives because of the cash shortages. Of the countries that implemented measures to force rapid dedollarization, only Mexico and Pakistan succeeded in keeping dollarization low (2.5 and 5.2 percent respectively at end-2007), although in both there were adverse macroeconomic consequences (Menkulasi et al., 2009). In the short run bond notes are going to reduce dollarization, as of January 2017 $75million worth of bond notes are already in circulation in the long run the policy is likely to cause problems because of macroeconomic consequences.


Though Mexico and Pakistan managed to reduce dollarization, they did so at some cost in the form of capital flight, lower remittance inflows, and less financial intermediation. Zimbabwe is already suffering from capital flight, lower foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, and less financial intermediation with a lot cash circulating outside the banking system estimated between US$2 to US$7 billion see Mugova and Sachs (2016). According to Reinhart, Rogoff, and Savastano (2003), in Mexico these policies caused a 100 percent increase in capital flight and a dramatic decrease in bank credit to the private sector. The proposition of bond notes to revive local industry and increase exports will suffer the same consequence of decrease in bank credit to private sector therefore local industry will not be capitalised. For other countries, forced dedollarization proved to be a failure and had significant macroeconomic costs (Menkulasi et al., 2009). In the first half of the 1980s, Bolivia and Peru implemented measures to rapidly dedollarize the banking system by forcing conversions of foreign currency deposits to local currency. These efforts, undertaken while inflation was high, were followed by an abrupt depreciation of the local currency, resulting in capital flight and financial disintermediation. Continued macroeconomic instability over the next few years led to a reversal of policies, which lifted the restriction on foreign currency deposit and led to rapid redollarization. Bolivia is now again one of the most highly dollarized economies in the world (Menkulasi et al., 2009). The effort to dedollarise by Zimbabwe through bond notes is likely to result in limited success.

References

Baliño, T. J., Bennett, A., & Borensztein, E. (1999). Monetary policy in dollarized economies (Vol. 171): International Monetary Fund.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2009). Financial institutions and markets across countries and over time-data and analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, Vol.
Menkulasi, J., Erasmus, L., & Leichter, J. (2009). Dedollarization in Liberia-lessons from cross-country experience: International Monetary Fund.
Mugova, S & Sachs, P.R (2016) Corporate governance structure and accountability as affected by national governmental infrastructure in developing countries Corporate Ownership & Control Vol 13 Issue 4
Reinhart, C. M., Rogoff, K. S., & Savastano, M. A. (2003). Addicted to dollars. Retrieved from
Schneider, F., & Enste, D. (2000). Shadow Economies around the World Size, Causes, and Consequences.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Public financial transparency and accountability of government revenues and expenditures in Zimbabwe

-
Zimbabweans are familiar with budget statement presented by the Minister of Finance in the parliament every year but unfortunately the public has never received detailed financial statements after expenditure. Zimbabweans usually know the amount which is allocated to certain ministries such as health, education social welfare but the public has never received financial reports detailing how the money was used. The lack of financial reporting means that the public has no information to make the government accountable. Accountability has been viewed since time immemorial as a channel for ascertaining the use of power by an individual or an organization that has been entrusted with the task of performing prescribed tasks (Premchand 1999).  Kautilya wrote a manual on bureaucracy before the Christian age, he observed that human nature was disposed to acquire public money for private gain. He wrote: “Just as it is impossible not to taste honey or poison that one may find at the tip ...
Read more

Understanding Zimbabwe’s budget deficits, government debt and economic effects

-
The policy that ‘we eat what we kill’ was made popular in Zimbabwe during the Global Political Agreement period when Tendai Biti was the Minister of Finance. This is a principle advocated for by balanced-budget proponents. On the contrary governments also run budget deficits I have dedicated this article to explain the concept of budget deficits. A budget deficit the amount by which public spending exceeds revenue over a particular period of time. The Zimbabwean government is currently running budget deficits. The harmful effects of running budget deficits include; crowding out of the private sector, high real rates of interest, low national savings, low economic growth rates, large current account deficits and inflation, among others. John Maynard Keynes holds that in times of severe economic shriveling in the private economy, it is tolerable for the government to go into debt and increase spending to compensate for the fall in consumer and other private sector expe...
Read more