Partisan politics and Public finance: Changes in public spending in Zimbabwe

-


The partisan politics model of public policy is based on the view that the ideological preferences of the ruling parties are significant drivers of the level of government spending. Political parties that favor redistribution increase government spending whilst parties that prefer the working of the market system reduce government spending. A combination of the preferences of voters and political parties shape policy outputs such as public spending (Wittman, 1983; Keech, 1995). The opposing school attributes that public spending is shaped by variable economic, technological and demographic imperatives (Cusack, 1997). Partisan politics is at best marginal. 



Majority of voters or parties’ grassroots support is made up of lower income groups and labor which prefer a large and active state. The upper income groups and capital prefer a minimized role of the state in shaping the market operations and outcomes. Zanu PF preferred a state heavily engaged in regulating the market and using public finances to equalize the outcomes of market operations. The Economic Structural Adjustment Programme (ESAP) was meant to liberalize the economy but failed because the state preferred a tightly controlled economic system. The upper income groups are concerned with limiting the size of government and its control over financial resources. Parties compete for votes tends to focus on the interests of the different groups and they will focus on those interests when they implement their programs when in government. While economic, technological, and demographic factors are not unimportant in shaping policy, the place of partisan politics is central. There is a view that partisan politics plays little if any role in how governments in modern industrialized democracies (developed economies) shape public programs and finance them. In developing countries like Zimbabwe generally the partisan politics model is dominant.




In Zimbabwe partisan politics plays a major role in altering public spending levels. Partisan politics dominate the allocation of resources to policies such as land reform or presidential agricultural input scheme. The levels of public spending where the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe participated in quasi-fiscal operations were all motivated by partisan politics where the central bank took a role to fund tractors, fuel etc. to support the land reform. Budgets deficits are driven by partisan politics for instance to fund blue print programs such as ZimAsset motivated to fulfil election promises and often economic fundamentals and principles are ignored in the allocation of resources. This month it was reported in the news that the president ordered the reinstatement of more than 2000 Zanu PF youths who were struck off the government payroll following an audit report which unearthed ghost workers. The minister of finance’s proposals to cut salaries and suspend bonuses in 2016 hit a snag because of the partisan politics model which dominates the allocation of public spending. Whilst earlier the International Monetary Fund had reported to be happy with reforms everything changed when the proposals of the finance minister where turned down. The government’s quest for reforms was dominated by the party’s ideological preferences in the end there was a u-turn by the government and reforms were discarded. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Public financial transparency and accountability of government revenues and expenditures in Zimbabwe

-
Zimbabweans are familiar with budget statement presented by the Minister of Finance in the parliament every year but unfortunately the public has never received detailed financial statements after expenditure. Zimbabweans usually know the amount which is allocated to certain ministries such as health, education social welfare but the public has never received financial reports detailing how the money was used. The lack of financial reporting means that the public has no information to make the government accountable. Accountability has been viewed since time immemorial as a channel for ascertaining the use of power by an individual or an organization that has been entrusted with the task of performing prescribed tasks (Premchand 1999).  Kautilya wrote a manual on bureaucracy before the Christian age, he observed that human nature was disposed to acquire public money for private gain. He wrote: “Just as it is impossible not to taste honey or poison that one may find at the tip ...
Read more

Understanding Zimbabwe’s budget deficits, government debt and economic effects

-
The policy that ‘we eat what we kill’ was made popular in Zimbabwe during the Global Political Agreement period when Tendai Biti was the Minister of Finance. This is a principle advocated for by balanced-budget proponents. On the contrary governments also run budget deficits I have dedicated this article to explain the concept of budget deficits. A budget deficit the amount by which public spending exceeds revenue over a particular period of time. The Zimbabwean government is currently running budget deficits. The harmful effects of running budget deficits include; crowding out of the private sector, high real rates of interest, low national savings, low economic growth rates, large current account deficits and inflation, among others. John Maynard Keynes holds that in times of severe economic shriveling in the private economy, it is tolerable for the government to go into debt and increase spending to compensate for the fall in consumer and other private sector expe...
Read more

Will Zimbabwe's dedollarization efforts through bond notes succeed?

-
Image
The recent introduction of a new currency by Zimbabwe’s central bank the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) result in a process called reverse dollarization. Baliño, Bennett, and Borensztein (1999) note that reversing dollarization may be difficult because changes in practices regarding the settlement of transactions may be a slow process that depends on institutional changes and takes place only when there are significant benefits to be gained by switching currencies. The process will not be easy as people’s preferred choice of holding and storing value remains United States dollars and not the surrogate currency. There are no significant benefits to be gained by switching from foreign currency to bond notes. Forced dedollarization has had limited success, while dollarization may have fallen in the short run and was sustained in some cases, countries that tried to force dedollarization experienced financial disintermediation and capital flight (Menkulasi, Erasmus, & Leichter, 2009)...
Read more