Zimbabwe’s Operation Restore Economy, Now or Never?
Zimbabwe had a change of government in November 2017 which brought optimism that the economy might be guided on a recovery path following depression for several years since the turn of the millennium. Operation restore economy has not been launched and some people have already started to lose faith in the current administration’s ability to turn around the economy whilst some still believe the economy will be revived and grow again. There is no clear economic vision or policies which have been implemented yet by the government. The industry and firms which had closed have not reopened and the economy seems to be still in a dysfunctional state. It is the hope of Zimbabweans that they will one day have a vibrant economy, employment and the dilapidated infrastructure will be rebuilt. The process to rebuild the economy will not be an easy one it will require the determination, will and unity amongst the Zimbabweans to rebuild the fallen pillars of the great house of stone. Whilst reviving the economy for the country, to be once again the breadbasket of Africa is not a vision but backward looking. Things have changed, we are competing with other countries producing genetically modified crops, with economies of scale, highly mechanized and with better technology than ours. Fundamentals have changed since the 80s and 90s though some may argue that food is always required as it is a need, we need to be innovative to restore ourselves and compete other producers of food in Africa and the world. Tobacco might have been called the gold leaf during the 1940s when it was produced in Zimbabwe, to think that we can restore our production levels to the same levels and grow our economy through the same means as before is utterly false. Economies are dynamic things have changed, we need innovation and analysis of our new opportunities and threats.
Through
the land reform for instance we regressed through land fragmentation, destroyed
commercial farming and reverted to subsistence farming. The countries that have
developed did so, on the premise of land consolidation, economies of scale and mechanization,
consequently their rural population declined whilst urban population increased as
they got more industrialized. Many Zimbabweans think agriculture as the
mainstay of the economy will lead to recovery. Kodak went out of business
because to them it was business as usual whilst they failed to realise that the
new business had to do with sharing photos and Facebook saw the opportunity and
today it is one of the largest business entities. Businesses that used to
produce radios, cassettes recorders, Walkman’s, discman went out of business
because economies are changing through innovation. The economy is dynamic it doesn’t
remain stagnant, this eludes most people, it seems to many the idea that we
used to do it this way, is the most dominant ideology. When the Zimbabwean economy
was functional, we used not to import from South Africa and other countries
mostly all the products we can produce. The reason why we are importing
products we can produce is that it is costly to produce in Zimbabwe and the
country has structural problems such as power cuts amongst other problems. If
we are to revive our economy how are going to compete on costs? We used to
produce cotton, process it into cloth, and produced clothes for export markets
in our factories, on the contrary now we are importing used clothes. We have
over 90% unemployment and most people are now working in the informal sector.
There
is a lot that needs to be done to revive the dead industry. Our reasoning and
analysis seems to border around the premise that we used to produce raw
minerals for exports which might be the same economy that we used have for
close to hundred years ago. A country like Japan used to rely on the textile
industry and with time they had a vision to develop their electronics and
automobiles industries. In the same vain Zimbabwe must be able to craft an
economic vision, strategy and plan to develop into a formidable force which can
compete in international trade in certain specialized sectors of their choice.
It is not clear what the country’s comparative advantages are, despite that the
country produces various raw materials. In 2009 the country abandoned its currency
and adopted the United States dollar and other currencies however since then it
has always been postulated that the country will reintroduce the local currency
when fundamentals are right, despite that fundamentals were not right, treasury
bills, bond currency were introduced, and the Real Time Gross Settlement not
backed by actual money was introduced. The current state of our monetary system
is in jeopardy however we still hear of the same promise that we will have
local currency when fundamentals are right. What are the fundamentals and what
is being done to make them right and the period required for that is not known. The central bank
still doesn’t have the independence and integrity to be trusted with printing
money. If the country is not able to fix its monetary crisis reviving the
economy will always be a pipeline dream.
Repealing
laws like indigenisation may not yield the much-anticipated benefits unless
otherwise policies are made to attract foreign direct investment. We seem to
lack quantified impact of policy changes i.e. the change of indigenisation’s
policy impact on foreign direct investment. Economic policies should make an impact
without the need to be preached, if an economic policy needs to be preached like
the gospel then definitely such a policy is not a good economic policy. We had
a fiscal policy statement that failed to influence the level of supply and
aggregate demand, increase level of economic activities, investment and
business. The people managing our economy need to think, innovate, develop and
create real policies that will lead again the economy to prosperity, a lot needs
to be done, there are no signs that the economic management and restoration is
moving towards the right direction.
Comments
Post a Comment