A brief focus on Zimbabwe’s economy and its outlook

-
A plethora of policy pronouncements, substantial de-industrialisation and some remarkable and controversial economic events over the years in Zimbabwe have given rise to the question; ‘Does Zimbabwe have an economy at all?’. I have dedicated this article to really outline what exactly constitutes an economy in a country.  In a recent Facebook post by the Vice president of Zimbabwe Emmerson Mnangagwa (08 March 2017) he lamented over the way the Reserve Bank Governor; John Mangundya and the Minister of Finance; Patrick Chinamasa were handling economic issues. He stated,

“These guys are too theoretical in the way they operate. Their usual excuses are monotonous. If you go to Chinamasa, he will tell you I do not have money and if you ask Mangudya he will tell you the economy is about to take off.”

 An economy is definitely not an aeroplane which gets ready to take off and lands at a prescribed destination. Since the two officials mentioned by the Vice President are in charge of key economic portfolios, a brief exposition of what constitutes an economy would help ordinary people and scholars to appreciate the concept of an economy.

Simply defined, an economy is the large set of inter-related production, consumption and money supply activities that aid in determining how scarce resources are allocated. The massive and rapid closures of industrial firms in Zimbabwe have resulted in low or no production at all. The once vivacious industrial hubs in Zimbabwe are now as quiet and lifeless as the cemetery. A drive through Zimbabwe’s industrial sites now is akin to passing through a ghost town. The key components of a modern economy are; production, consumption and adequate money supply. In Zimbabwe there is now little or no production at all. Given the little or no productive capacity, Zimbabwe is now a consumption economy.  In a consumption economy, successful corporations are the ones who can best manage their global networks of suppliers to obtain the lowest costs which is not possible for Zimbabwean economy because of foreign currency and cash shortages.

Consumer spending in Zimbabwe mainly creates jobs in other countries. Many of the consumer goods we buy are imported from neighbouring South Africa and other countries. It has been largely publicized before that Zimbabwe is an agro-based economy and at its peak agriculture contributed 30 percent of GDP. In the early 2000s at the start of the land reform program it was widely broadcasted that “Land is the economy and the economy is the land.” A very simple understanding of economics points out that land is not an economy but simply a factor of production. In other words, we need all the factors of production which include land, labour, capital and entrepreneurship for a healthy and sound economy. Zimbabweans might have taken land but without a right combination of all factors of production the agricultural economy envisaged remains a pipeline dream.


The economy of a particular country is governed by its culture, laws, history, and geography, among other factors, and it evolves due to necessity. The Scottish philosopher Adam Smith (1776) believed that economies evolved from pre-historic bartering systems to money and eventually credit-based economies. Zimbabwe is a cash based economy, and now with a currency and cash shortages it means the economy is crippled. It is thus important to know how the aggregate economy behaves. The glaring question now given all the fundamentals hangs: “Is Zimbabwe still an economy since it lacks the other two key component of an economy which are production and adequate money supply?”.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Public financial transparency and accountability of government revenues and expenditures in Zimbabwe

-
Zimbabweans are familiar with budget statement presented by the Minister of Finance in the parliament every year but unfortunately the public has never received detailed financial statements after expenditure. Zimbabweans usually know the amount which is allocated to certain ministries such as health, education social welfare but the public has never received financial reports detailing how the money was used. The lack of financial reporting means that the public has no information to make the government accountable. Accountability has been viewed since time immemorial as a channel for ascertaining the use of power by an individual or an organization that has been entrusted with the task of performing prescribed tasks (Premchand 1999).  Kautilya wrote a manual on bureaucracy before the Christian age, he observed that human nature was disposed to acquire public money for private gain. He wrote: “Just as it is impossible not to taste honey or poison that one may find at the tip ...
Read more

Understanding Zimbabwe’s budget deficits, government debt and economic effects

-
The policy that ‘we eat what we kill’ was made popular in Zimbabwe during the Global Political Agreement period when Tendai Biti was the Minister of Finance. This is a principle advocated for by balanced-budget proponents. On the contrary governments also run budget deficits I have dedicated this article to explain the concept of budget deficits. A budget deficit the amount by which public spending exceeds revenue over a particular period of time. The Zimbabwean government is currently running budget deficits. The harmful effects of running budget deficits include; crowding out of the private sector, high real rates of interest, low national savings, low economic growth rates, large current account deficits and inflation, among others. John Maynard Keynes holds that in times of severe economic shriveling in the private economy, it is tolerable for the government to go into debt and increase spending to compensate for the fall in consumer and other private sector expe...
Read more

Will Zimbabwe's dedollarization efforts through bond notes succeed?

-
Image
The recent introduction of a new currency by Zimbabwe’s central bank the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) result in a process called reverse dollarization. Baliño, Bennett, and Borensztein (1999) note that reversing dollarization may be difficult because changes in practices regarding the settlement of transactions may be a slow process that depends on institutional changes and takes place only when there are significant benefits to be gained by switching currencies. The process will not be easy as people’s preferred choice of holding and storing value remains United States dollars and not the surrogate currency. There are no significant benefits to be gained by switching from foreign currency to bond notes. Forced dedollarization has had limited success, while dollarization may have fallen in the short run and was sustained in some cases, countries that tried to force dedollarization experienced financial disintermediation and capital flight (Menkulasi, Erasmus, & Leichter, 2009)...
Read more